Saturday, October 29, 2016

My Story of Newton

My Story of Newton

Wednesday 09/07/2016 14:58MST: With the center of post-tropical cyclone Newton passing over, I am standing near a small wastewater treatment facility attempting to study and photograph several storm-petrels. I had checked this small body of water earlier in the day for any storm driven birds as well as several nearby small golf course ponds. I had found none. At 14:20 MST Richard Wilt reported to the Tucson Rare Bird Alert a white-rumped storm-petrel at the Amado Water Treatment Plant. Andrew Core immediately posted the report to both the AZ/NM list server and the Arizona Birding Facebook Group.

I arrived back at the Amado WTP at 14:58 MST. The final advisory from the National Hurricane Center for this storm was issued at 15:00 MDT (or 14:00 MST). This advisory stated that the center of the storm was located near latitude 31.6 north,
longitude 111.2 west, 12 miles southwest of the Amado WTP. The storm was reportedly moving NNE at 18 mph and expected to turn northeast. This means that the center of the storm was moving over this location. Weather conditions while I was there varied from no rain to light rain to short periods of heavy rain; winds were mostly gusty from the southwest & south 10-30 mph with some period of calm, heavy overcast. Heavier rains & winds generally coincided. Post-tropical cyclone Newton was passing over the area as a tropical depression/remnant low.

Nearly immediately upon my return, I see a storm-petrel with a white rump patch and then another and then there was an all dark storm-petrel and a phalarope that I misidentified. I began studying and photographing the storm-petrels. At this moment I felt very lost; several years has past since I was out on the ocean looking at storm-petrels. What was I looking at?

While studying and photographing the storm-petrels I kept reminding my self that I needed to scan the skies for other birds. On one such scan, at 15:09 MST, I detected a larger bird coming in from the south. Initially I thought this bird was a booby, it was about 500 yards away, varying between estimated 50 to 100 feet above ground, and quickly heading roughly towards me. I made a conscience decision to not use the binoculars; the speed at which things were happening meant that I could lose any photographic opportunities if I was fumbling between binoculars & camera. As it approached and I got a more of a side view I realized this was a shearwater. The shearwater circled over the south half of the pond once or twice, the moved north over the east side of the pond before swinging west over the north end of the pond and past my position. The bird continued west over Interstate-19 and Arivaca Junction when it was lost visually. It was difficult to get focus on the shearwater initially but once I did, I followed it with the camera. In 42 seconds I took 64 images of the shearwater, mostly in bursts. Once the shearwater was out of view and after a few seconds of scanning for its return or anything else I took a breath, sent a post off to the AZ/NM list server and returned to studying & photographing the storm-petrels for the next two hours.

Soon after the shearwater disappeared, other birders began arriving on the scene. At first it was those from Green Valley, eventually those from Tucson, and later from Phoenix. Our discussion mainly focused on the storm-petrels with white rumps. There were at least four of them now plus the one with the dark rump. All those with white rumps appeared to be the same species. They were the same size, shape & structure, flew similarly, same pattern of white on the rump, same shade of black-brown, and had the same faint but visible ulnar bar on the upper wings. It seemed that all of us were trying to turn these birds into “Leach’s” Storm-Petrel the most likely white-rumped storm-petrel found off the west coast and the only one previously recorded in Arizona. Which one? The species formerly known as “Leach’s” had been split into three species Leach’s, Townsend’s, and Ainley’s. I knew none of the details of the split or how to tell the sibling species apart or what their ranges were. I’m pretty sure no one in the crowd knew either. Having taken hundreds of photographs I begin thinking about retreating to home where I can study my images and get more information about and possibly identify the white rumps storm-petrels. About this time I learn that Chris McCreedy is seeing storm-petrels at Patagonia Lake some 15 miles to the southeast. Apparently from the photos he shared, Wedge-rumped Storm-Petrel was being considered. I began to head home but got a message that a friend had just arrived and wanted my assistance. I’m not but two hundred yards away from the pond so I turn around. As I am looking for another spot to park, I see a small appearing all dark storm-petrel flying west over the frontage road and away from the pond. That triggered a question – “Did I take any photographs of the dark storm-petrel on the pond?”. I find a parking spot and my friend (they are all my friends, just some more so than others) and set out to relocate the all dark storm-petrel if it hadn’t just left. It was still there and while getting my photographs of this bird I determined it was a Least Storm-Petrel by the short rounded tail. I must have peaked at a field guide sometime while in my truck. Least Storm-Petrels have only been recorded in the state a few times and always in conjunction with a tropical storm. I also noticed that the storm-petrels with white rumps were nearly the same size as the Least. This was to become an important feature aiding us in determining what species we were dealing with. Several of us watched one of the white-rumped birds flying away from the pond only to find four with white rumps still on the pond along with the Least. More friends showing up and finally at about 17:30 I decide I need to leave. I follow some friends up the frontage road and just before we reached the south Green Valley development, an all black looking storm-petrel flew east to west over the frontage road and then curves back to the east. I stop, jump out of my truck with my camera but am unable to find the bird. It appeared larger than the Least we had just been looking at however without any context for size and no photographs this one was going to be reported up as “storm-petrel sp.”. We check one nearby golf course pond and then I head home.

Upon returning home, I downloaded photos from the camera to the computer. I had in excess of 600 photographs to sort through. My first priority was to determine what species of shearwater I had seen. Many others had seen the storm-petrels and besides I think we had one of them figured them out. I and only one other person saw the shearwater. I do not know who this other person was. He either left after the shearwater or got mixed in with the crowd that arrived later. I was focused on the birds.

Now began the process of elimination and inclusion. No notes were taken in the field though a quick look at several of the photographs confirmed what I did recall; a long thin bill, slim body, wide base of wings appeared greater than body width, longish tapered tail, dark above, and pale below including much of the underwing. I selected several of the better photographs, cropped them to show a nearly full from image of the bird and began the comparison with drawings in the only seabird guide I had at the time, Seabirds An Identification Guide by Peter Harrison 1983. The fairly long and thin bill eliminated Gadfly petrels in my opinion and in short order I settled on Pink-footed Shearwater. Moments later I forwarded one photographs of the shearwater and my tentative conclusion to David Vander Pluym. Nearly immediately I received the reply “Wedge-tailed”! I flipped the page of my seabird guide and yes; Wedge-tailed Shearwater is a better match.

Wedge-tailed Shearwater 

Between the time I began looking at photographs of this bird and when I consulted with others, I had determined that I was dealing with one of the larger shearwaters in the former genus Puffinus. [Now these larger shearwaters are in the genus Ardenna.] I eliminated the gadfly petrels (Pterodroma) based on the relatively long thin bill of this bird. The thickness relative to the length of gadfly petrel bills gives them a heavier bulkier and somewhat stubby bill appearance. Black-vented and Manx Shearwaters, though patterned similar to the bird I photographed, were discarded for consideration based on apparent size. The few times I have seen either of these two species they appeared small. Narrowing down the candidates further, Buller’s Shearwater has a bold upper wing pattern that this bird lacked. I thought I was left with just three large pale bellied shearwaters for sort through – Cory’s, Greater, & Pink-footed. Cory’s – no, range and white vent/undertail coverts. Greater – no, range and white collar nearly isolating cap. Pink-footed – yes, common on the west coast, an okay match on overall pattern, pink feet. At the time I ignored the fact that Pink-footed Shearwaters have pale bills with a very contrasting dark tip whereas the bird I had seen had a gray bill with perhaps a slightly darker tip. With my misidentification in hand, I sent a photograph showing the underwing & body of this bird to David Vander Pluym. David and Lauren Harter immediately replied that I had seen and photographed a Wedge-tailed Shearwater. I turned the page in my seabirds guide and there it was. All the characteristics visible in my photographs were depicted and described by Harrison. This report of Wedge-tailed Shearwater, if accepted by the Arizona Bird Committee, will be the first record of the species for Arizona and only the second inland record for the US.
Wedge-rumped Storm-Petrel

Before I left the Amado WTP, I believed we had identified one of the storm-petrel species and had been given some good hints for the other. The all-dark bird was identified as a Least Storm-Petrel. It was small appearing, not much larger than the swallows smarming over the pond, with a rounded or wedge-shaped tail. Other similar appearing species are roughly 30%-50% larger than Least (therefore would have dwarfed the swallows) with forked or notched tails. The white-rumped birds were approximately the same size as the Least Storm-Petrel when viewed sitting on water side-by-side and in flight, maybe slightly larger. This size comparison was useful. Contenders for the white-rumped birds included Leach’s, Townsend’s, Ainley’s, Wedge-tailed, and Wilson’s Storm-Petrels. All but the Wedge-tailed should appear visibly larger than the Least Storm-Petrel. The most obvious feature on the white-rumped storm-petrels provides us with the clincher (in my opinion). The white patch at the base of the tail is the upper tail coverts. On Leach’s, Townsend’s, and Ainley’s the white rump patch is rounded or even lobed and the maximum extent seems to be less than 50% of the length of the tail. On a Wilson’s the shape of the white patch is likened to a band across the basal third or so of the tail. On all four of the white-rumped storm-petrels observed, the shape of the white patch was, dare I say, wedge-shaped. The maximum extent at the point of the wedge was about 70% the length of the tail. Additionally, the white patch wrapped around the edges of the base of the tail. Therefore, at least some of the outer undertail coverts are white. I believe this latter feature occurs on only one of the species I was considering. So the white-rumped birds were identified as Wedge-rumped Storm-Petrel. While I am sure there are other features on both of these species that could be used to nail down these identifications (wing shape & size, tail shape & length, manner of flight in varying winds, perhaps even head shape) I do not have the experience necessary to decipher them.

Least Storm Petrel 

The following few days also held a few moments of excitement though nothing near the intensity of those hours during the storm’s passage. I joined Mark and Molly on Thursday for the day after the storm search. Without finding anything usual at Amado WTP we proceeded to Patagonia Lake. There we met up with David & Lauren, saw a couple of Common Terns but no storm-petrels. David & Lauren mentioned that they had picked up a Wedge-rumped Storm-Petrel the previous night at the rest area along I-19 south of Green Valley and taken it to a Tucson rehabber. We received a report of a storm-petrel at Bensen STP, so off we went. By the time we got to Bensen, the storm-petrel was long absent. A Black-bellied Plover observed at a nearby golf course may have been a migrant forced down by the storm the previous night. A report of a probable Wedge-tailed Storm-Petrel in Mesa prompted David & Lauren and others to head homeward via Riverview Park. Mark, Molly, & I decide to call it a day. On Saturday, yes three days after the storm, an all dark storm-petrel was discovered at Bensen WTP. Louise and I arrive mid-day and find a group of birders looking at what we determine to be a Black Storm-Petrel. This bird was observed and photographed by many. I believe this was the only Black reported as a result of Newton. The only prior record of Black Storm-Petrels in Arizona was at Lake Havasu after Nora (1997).
Black Storm-Petrel 

Discussion of species ranges

Wedge-tailed Shearwater [Ardenna pacifica] ranges throughout the tropical & subtropical Pacific and Indian Oceans. In the eastern Pacific Ocean they are known to breed on San Benedicto Island about 350 miles west of mainland Mexican and 250 miles south of the south tip of Baja California Sur. According to Howell, 90% of these birds are dark-morph. Apparently light-morph birds are locally & seasonally common off the west coast of Mexico north to about 20 degrees north latitude from November to June. From July through October there appears to be smaller numbers of light-morph bird however they range further north and can be found around the tip of the Baja Peninsula and into or at least at the mouth of the Gulf of California. It is presumed that a majority of these light-morph birds are non-breeders wandering from the Hawaiian Islands [Howell, 2012]. While Wedge-tailed Shearwaters are regular off the west coast of Mexico north to the south end of the Gulf of California and around the south end of the Baja Peninsula. They are casual off the west coast of the US and there is a single inland record at the Salton Sea. There are about 13 records, mostly from California plus two from Oregon and one from Washington. These records include both light and dark morphs however light morphs appear more numerous in the fall. I was not able to find any records or reports of this species from the west coast of Baja or in the Gulf of California north of La Paz.

Wedge-rumped Storm-Petrels [Oceanodroma tethys] range along the west coasts of South & Central America northward along the west coast of Mexico and the southern half of the west coast of Baja and into the southern portion of the Gulf of California. There are two subspecies recognized that may represent two species, O. t. tethys (Galapagos Storm-Petrel) and O. t. kelsalli (Peruvian Storm-Petrel). Even though there is much overlap in overall ranges each has a distinct breeding region as indicated by their nicknames. During their non-breeding season O. t. kelsalli occurs along the west coast of the Americas from Chile to Baja and tend to occur in continental shelf waters more frequently than O. t. tethys.

Least Storm Petrels [Oceanodroma microsoma] is commonly found around Baja California, in the Gulf of California, and south along the inshore waters of Mexico & Central America. It also regularly occurs north along the coast to central California. It breeds off the west coast of Baja and a few islands in the gulf. Least Storm-Petrels have been pushed into the desert southwest several times by tropical storms, including Arizona.

Black Storm-Petrels [Oceanodroma melania] is a local breeder on islands off the coast of southern California and northwest Mexico, including the Gulf of California. They are known to occur over inshore waters from the southern California southern to Central America. Black Storm-Petrels have been pushed into the desert southwest several times by tropical storms, including Arizona.

The Storm and Speculation

Tropical Depression 15-E formed approximately 220 miles south-southwest of Manzanillo, Colima, Mexico on Sunday 9/4/2016. At that time it was moving north-northwest at 2 mph. The potential for this storm to develop was recognized a week prior and was tracked as a system of disturbed weather as it moved along the coast of Guatemala and southwest Mexico. This storm was expected to impact the southern portion of Baja California, approximately 560 miles NNW late Monday night or Tuesday. Six hours after the initial advisory, this storm was upgraded and named. It now had maximum sustained winds of 40 mph and had accelerated forward movement to 8 mph still NNW direction. Newton continued strengthen and accelerating and by mid-day Monday 9/5/2016 was declared a hurricane. At this point it was 215 miles SE of Cabo San Lucas moving NW at 16 mph with maximum sustained winds of 75 mph. Hurricane Newton made its first land fall early Tuesday morning 9/6/2016 near Cabo San Lucas with 90 mph sustained winds and movement NNW at 18mph. Newton reemerged over open water late Tuesday near Santa Rosalia Mexico moving north at 17 mph with an excepted turn to the NNE on Wednesday. By 3am MDT Newton had made its second landfall and been down graded to a tropical storm. Over the next 12 hours, Newton weakened yet continued movement to north to north-northeast at about 18 mph into southern Arizona. The 12:00pm MDT advisory still had Newton as a tropical storm with winds of 45 mph centered 25 miles SW of Nogales, AZ. Three hours later the final advisory of Newton was issued, 25 miles WNW of Nogales and maximum sustained winds of 35 mph.

The satellite image with the storm track is from a Wikipedia article discussing Hurricane Newton, the hand drawn shaded areas shows wind speeds (yellow = tropical storm, red = hurricane) data from NHC, and the arrowed arcs show how I believe the winds swept birds along the west coast of Mexico and into the Gulf of California.

I speculate that the cyclonic winds around the storm center pushed seabirds northwest along the west coast of Mexico and perhaps out to sea. As the storm approached the Baja Peninsula, the “out to sea” route was effectively cutoff and seabirds were funneled northwest into the Gulf of California. The three species of storm-petrels found in Arizona as a result of this storm inhabit the continental shelf waters where Newton’s winds could have swept them along the west Mexico coast and into the Gulf of California. Even while Hurricane Newton was over land in Baja, tropical storm force winds were occurring all the way across the Gulf of California and along the west coast of Sinaloa and Sonora. As the storm continued to move NNW along the peninsula, seabirds would continue to be pushed northwestward in the Gulf by the large swath of tropical storm force winds. Once the storm emerged over the waters of the Gulf, the northwest path was cutoff and the seabirds either were pushed over land or got “trapped “ in the center of the storm. By this time the storm’s eyewall had dissipated and the calm at the center of the storm was history. As the storm moved northward towards Arizona, it continued to disintegrate. It seems most likely that the seabirds rode the relative calm of the center of the storm north 200+ miles until they found bodies of water on which to rest and potentially feed. During the passage of the storm, all the seabirds were reported from areas along or east of the reported track of the storm’s center. The initial timing of these observations roughly coincides with the passing of the center of the storm. Geography, locations (and timing) of observers, and locations of bodies of water are additional factors that need to be looked into.

As an almost final note: Specimens of two of the Wedge-rumped Storm-Petrels were measured and determined to O. t. kelsalli (Peruvian Storm-Petrel).

Now a final note: Where are my photographs? 

Wednesday, October 5, 2016

Asian Plover in Arizona

Monday 10/03/2016 06:41MST: I am standing on a berm next to Gary. The sun has just peeked over the nearby hills to the east and is beginning light up the mud flat and shallow pond in front of us.  A strong wind out of the southwest is blowing making it feel cold. We are scoping the far shoreline of the small pond and the mud flats further away for any sign of motion. The others are on another nearby rise and Dave is checking out a small wet area to the south.  We have been here for thirty minutes, the only shorebirds around were four roosting Long-billed Dowitchers and they have left. A Common Tern flies over raising the excitement level somewhat but it to departs. Faces are growing long, almost as long as the drive we’ve just made. And then to the east Gary and I hear a plover calling from a small wet area I was thinking about investigating.  Gary makes the call - Lesser Sand-Plover!
Lesser Sand-Plover just after flying in from the east.

Our party also includes Deb, Janine, and Chris.  We left Tucson at quarter to 01:00AM (I left Green Valley an hour earlier).  Upon arriving we meet up with Andrew, Dave, Mark, & Molly, they had stayed the night in Flagstaff and arrived at Round Cedar Lake a few minutes before us.  There were a few others present however I focused on searching for the quarry and did not mingling with the other birders much.

Whether intentional or not a small plover could easily conceal itself amongst clods of dirt and small furrows, particularly with the low angle of the sunlight early in the morning. We fortune seekers came to this remote location & isolate site with the hopes of seeing a vagrant shorebird discovered & identified Sunday by Chuck LaRue and Jason Wilder. The site is a playa where someone has scraped the soil leaving several shallow depressions each accompanied by pile of dirt. The depressions hold water and the berms provide a good vantage point. Good for birds and birders.

Upon calling, the Lesser Sand-Plover flies from its easterly hiding spot to the west around our group of birders and lands near the far edge of the small pond closest to us.  The bird called for the duration of its flight.  Whether the plover was calling before it flew or immediately after taking flight is not known and really doesn’t matter much at this point.  It would have been nice to get a recording of the call but again, it really doesn’t matter – we can identify this thing visually.

For the next hour and forty minutes we take in as much of this bird as possible. I personally bounce between taking photographs including two videos and studying it through the scope. Others are doing the same. There are minor and respectful celebrations - high-fives, handshakes, fist pumps and knockings, and a few hugs. 

Lesser Sand-Plover was once referred to as Mongolian Plover in North America. I suspect that some taxonomic committee in Europe or Asia determined that the birds once known as Mongolian Plover were merely a form of the Lesser Sand-Plover, they were lumped and the English name Lesser Sand-Plover now refers to both. The AOU at least adopted the name Lesser Sand-Plover in 2004. Interestingly (mildly) the scientific name of the ‘old’ Mongolian Plover Charadrius mongolus is also the scientific name of the ‘new’ Lesser Sand-Plover. And the scientific name of the subspecies of Lesser Sand-Plover that so far has been found in North America is Charadrius mongolus mongolus, the Mongolian Lesser Sand-Plover. What I am trying to say with all this useless information is that I much prefer the English name “Mongolian Plover”.
Lesser Sand-Plover - 10/3/2016 Round Cedar Lake, Navajo Res., Coconino Co., AZ

Lesser Sand-Plovers are rare vagrants to North America. Most of the records are from Alaska and particularly the Aleutian and Bering Sea Islands as well as around Nome and Barrow. There are a smattering of records along the west coast from Vancouver, BC to San Diego, CA and a handful of records in the east. This observation is the first for the interior of the western US. Lesser Sand-Plovers breeding range is from the Himalayas to northeast Siberia and apparently western Alaska. They spend the winter in coastal areas of India, Southeast Asia, and Australia. Their migration is typically through East Asia and the southwest Pacific Ocean. Clearly this bird is way off track.  Normally a coastal species, this individual is more than 300 miles from the nearest coastline (Rocky Point) and 400 miles due east of Los Angeles.

Long into our observation of the plover a Tundra Peregrine Falcon shows on the scene. It was migrating and apparently hungry. This little scape in the earth didn’t off much. The little plover was a candidate for the falcon, definitely more meat than on the Barn Swallows and Horned Larks flying by. The Lesser Sand-Plover ceased foraging, that is it froze and became another dirt clod until the falcon departed. After another thirty minutes we too departed to look for a meal at the IHOP in Flagstaff.   

Peregrine Falcon upper left, Lesser Sand-Plover lower right

Wednesday, January 7, 2015

AZ Big Year - Recovery

For the past week I have been trying to recover from the previous year.  Late in 2013 I set a goal for myself to observe 400 species of birds in Arizona during the 2014 calendar year.  My goal was personal, could I do it?  I believed this would be a good incentive for me to explore and learn about new birding locations around the state.  I knew that I had no planned trips outside of Arizona except for a week in Colorado.  And most important, my wonderful wife agreed that this was the year to go for it! I was not competing with anyone and I was not trying to set a new record.  I learned of the previous record only a day or two before starting while discussing my plans with another birder that happened to be the previous record holder.  I believe he said something to the affect that it was time for a new record. A new record has been set.
Though I did not advertise that I was doing a big year, I did not hide it either.  From the onset three other birders knew I was making my attempt. Early on, several folks noticed my eBird total for the year skyrocketing and asked. As the year progressed I felt that it was kind of common knowledge among the state’s birding community.  I was however surprised to find that I was mentioned and congratulated in a posting to the ABA Facebook page.
I was out birding 305 days in 2014.  Eighty-nine of those days were dedicated to Big Year Birding.  Most of the remaining days I was birding for another purpose, guiding, scouting, or volunteering and I saw many of the year birds in this way. For guiding & volunteering activities I put 14400 miles on my truck and 12150 miles specifically dedicated to the Big Year.  Data from eBird indicates that 444 species of birds were recorded in Arizona during 2014. Of those, ten (10) are not countable by ABA standards and I did not see any of them. That leaves twenty-one (21) species I did not see during the year.  I made attempts but failed to see five of the 21; Slate-throated Redstart, California Quail, Common Grackle, Lapland Longspur, and Least Flycatcher.  For various reasons, I chose not to chase or could not chase the remaining sixteen (16) birds that I did not see.  [The Sharp-tailed Sandpiper stands out amongst this crowd; the report that it was no longer present arrived the day before I freed up and had planned to go.]
Interesting side note: The California Condor at the beginning of the year was not countable by ABA Standards.  Before the end of the year the committee that determines such things, voted such that the California Condor is now countable.  Their decisions led to a trip to the Grand Canyon where not only did I see the Condor, I also saw a Pine Grosbeak.
Another side note: I anticipated that the AOU Checklist Committee would vote to split the Curve-billed Thrasher.  I saw and photographed both forms of Curve-billed Thrashers during the year. The split didn’t happen.
No one single species stands out above the others as the best bird of the year.  I saw seventeen new state birds during the year:
Bell's Sparrow
Baseline Rd-Salome Hwy
Tundra Swan
Prescott--Willow Lake
Pinyon Jay
Near Williams
Black-capped Chickadee
Fredonia-277 Altus Ln
Am. Three-toed Woodpecker
Near Jacob’s Lake
Ring-necked Pheasant
Yuma-5800-5998 W County 9th St
Broad-winged Hawk
De Anza Trail--Tubac
Dusky Grouse
Green's Peak
Gray Jay
Sheep Crossing
Caspian Tern
Glendale Recharge Ponds
Black-billed Magpie
Teec Nos Pos Wash
Long-tailed Jaeger
Lake Havasu City--N Pittsburgh Pt
Worm-eating Warbler
Patagonia-Sonoita Creek Preserve
Blue-headed Vireo
stakeout Sinaloa Wren, Tubac (2013-2014)
Red-headed Woodpecker
Aravaipa Canyon--west trailhead
California Condor
Grand Canyon NP--Bright Angel Lodge
Pine Grosbeak
Grand Canyon NP--Yavapai Point

And I saw 370 new country birds:  Apache 49, Cochise 15, Coconino 22, Gila 35, La Paz 35, Maricopa 65, Mohave 40, Navajo 4, Pima 11, Pinal 26, Santa Cruz 8, Yavapai 37, Yuma 23, [did not visit Graham & Greenlee].
I was asked the other day, “What’s next?”. My quick response was “a year of Zen birding”. I really haven’t decided what that means yet; I guess I’ll let that philosophy gel in my mindfulness for a while.  I do want to learn bird distribution in Pima County better.  Since becoming the Pima County eBird editor, I have learned how much more there is to learn about Pima County birds and birders.
I now declare my 2014 Arizona Big Year complete.  While the birding ended on December 31, I felt that I needed to tie up some loose ends before declaring that I’m done.  I have a few other loose threads to pull on, like determining how many species I photographed and cataloging all the year’s photographs.  I'll take care of those if I feel like it and have the time.  It’s been a blast and now it’s time to move on.

The hat that has been with me all year has been hung in (semi) retirement.

I will always remember: Life is simple. Eat. Sleep. Bird.

Wednesday, December 31, 2014

AZ Big Year - Week Fifty-Two 12/24 – end of the year

This is the final week of 2014 and my Arizona Big Year.  The time is waning as well as my energy and motivation for the chase.  There are currently several known potential year birds for the taking.  Why should I continue?  My goal has been met and exceeded.  A new record has been set.  Isn’t it just a waste of gas, driving several hours just to see a bird?
When I began this challenge I made a commitment to myself to follow through with it.  I was not going to let this goal interfere with my guiding (more on that later), the only avenues out were the health & well being of my wife, my Mom, or myself. If Louise or my Mom needed my attention, they would get it.  Fortunately all has gone well here.  I have cut an excursion or two short because I want to support Louise with a few of her objectives but I have not given up.  So what if I you stop now? No one will know, I’ve broken the record. I’ve met my goal.  So what?  Well I would know that I had “given up” or took the easy path.
On Christmas Day, Thursday 25th, I headed out to the grasslands north and east of Sonoita.  I hoped to find my own Lapland Longspur.  Several of this species have been reported around the state in the past several weeks and I even chased one in Maricopa County (twice).  I found plenty of Chestnut-collared Longspurs and a single McCown’s Longspur, but no Laplands. 
On Saturday 27th I decided I would hike up Florida Canyon.  Florida Canyon is one of my favorite spot to bird alone and a favored spot for guiding.  Today was birding alone.  If I saw anything - great, if not - great! It turned out to be rather productive. I photographed a pair of Black-capped Gnatcatchers.  I found a Golden-crowned Sparrow, and photographed it.  I heard, saw, and photographed one Rufous-capped Warbler. I saw a flock of 27 Band-tailed Pigeons and photographed more than half of them at once.  And finally I heard one of the Elegant Trogons previously seen in this wonderful little canyon.  When I get home I hear about a possible Pacific Loon in Green Valley, I verify it, photograph it, and report it to the List Server for the TAS Rare Bird Alert. What a day! No new year birds but one of the most fun days I’ve had in a while.
Instead of panicking about the end of the year and what year birds to chase, I head up to Florida Wash (not the canyon).  I find the lone male Black-capped Gnatcatcher that been hanging around this area for a while. In fact he was the first bird I saw after getting out of my vehicle, he was flying across an open area and posed for pictures.  Later I find the female Evening Grosbeak that was first found on the Christmas Count a week & half ago.  She too posed for pictures.  As I was leaving, both the gnatcatcher and the grosbeak appeared in the corral.  The gnatcatcher played through the bushes while the grosbeak landed on the water tank to drink.  What a wonderful way to delay my departure!
By now, Monday 29th, I knew of a few new potential year birds around.  A White-eyed Vireo in Portal and a Red-necked Grebe northwest of Phoenix. From a time & distance aspect, neither was very appealing.  I guess if I had not yet met my goal, I might have been more motivated. So I went exploring down Proctor Road to where it turns into the Elephant Head bike path. I didn’t see or hear much exciting but thoroughly enjoyed myself.  Monday night I learn that the Red-necked Grebe was seen again by a number of folks and there are two species of scots on this lake.  If timing can be worked out, I could make another try for the Fulvous Whistling Duck and the Lapland Longspur.
I back out of the garage at exactly 5AM.  I arrive at Lake Pleasant at 07:48 and the sun has just popped over the hills to the southeast.  I am pretty quick at finding the three scoters from the Two Cow Cove overlook, not looking in the cove but out towards Burro Island.  Two Black Scoters and one White-winged Scoter have been present on this lake for several days now. I had previsouly seen both of these species this year (the Black Scoter in Tucson and the White-winged Scoters on this lake in February).  I take a few long distance photographs so that I can claim I photographed a Black Scoter this year.  After an hour of following yesterdays directions, I decide to follow the directions of the person that originally found the grebe.  I stationed myself on the southwest shore of the reservoir near the ten-lane boat ramp. I find the Red-necked Grebe across this cove near Burro Island to the east of the scoters (I can see them too).  I called Larry & Brian knowing that they too were looking for this species.  I lose the grebe when it dives at the same time a Peregrine Falcon flies by.  I have a nice conversation with a Maricopa County Deputy Sheriff.  Seconds after the deputy leaves, I find the Red-necked Grebe a few hundred yards off the shore.  I try digiscoping with no success, it just too windy to hold both the iPhone and the scope steady.  I call Larry & Brian again, there other the other side of the boat ramp and quickly get over to my position.  We find the Red-necked Grebe for several minutes before loosing track of it and finding a Horned Grebe.  This grebe comes in even closer and I get some decent photos with my long lens camera.
I leave Larry & Brian with the grebe & Lake Pleasant behind.  I head south to Tres Rios to look for any whistling-ducks.  I then head to Liberty School road to look for longspurs. Farmers are working in the field.  I continue on the Old Highway 80 where the first Fulvous Whistling-Dick was reported.  I see a Greater Yellowlegs, its just not the same.  I start heading home.  I make a stop at Coachline Gravel Pit pond and pick up the female Common Goldeneyes but miss the two geese that have been present. I get home at about 6pm, thirteen hours and 460 sixty miles.

Louise and I have appointments in Tucson on the 31st, the only birding I do is to look for some Eastern Bluebirds and a Yellow-shafted Flicker (neither year birds) that Mark & Molly found earlier in the day.  So I end my 2014 Big Year birding season by getting blown and rained out of Fort Lowell Park. What a year! 413